- … by considering executives’ time restrictions
- … by professional presentation and data processing
|
|
- … by extensive and comprehensive data evaluation and professional result visualization
- … by topic clustering according to criteria / sub criteria and superordinate terms (e.g. communication) with respect to a transparent prioritization of improvement areas and action planning
|
|
- … by the benchmarking-module for a direct comparison of different organization units, delayed self assessment of the same unit and so forth
- … by uniform systematics
|
|
| | 
- … by giving an exact account of the structure and content of the underlying Excellence-Model during the SAB®-self-assessment itself
- … by system adjustments specific to branch respectively organizationg
|
|
- … by a purposive design of the survey conception and the evaluation software SAB®-TOOL for ascertaining essential information
- … in respect to an analysis of communication problems, lack of information, understanding of priorities, reality perception and organization culture
|
|
- … by immediate response and result discussion
- … by a computer-assisted evaluation with the SAB®-TOOL developed for this means
|
|
|
